Babson College Professor Tom Davenport recommended Web 1.5 is probably a better solution to 1.0 or 2.0 any single for modern business and he says. Best of what experts and experts proposed a world more free-wheeling. Of user-generated content
I'm dead set against his methods. It is the surest way to kill any useful 2.0 create this is the reason.
In his blog business into hard wa ngaraikan why 1.5 is greater than 2.0, Davenport argues:
"Proponents of 2.0 thoughts on user-generated content is blowing wind of 2.0, 2.0, Enterprise, or Rhubarb 2.0 Health 2.0 is, we believe that how their request only participative work and of course. No request in democratizing of content creation and management However, in most cases, the value in the relevant professional.
He lays out the central argument is that we as consumers benefit with access to both user-generated content as well as the opinions of experts. His example: role for blogging Huffington Post gaming nerd helps us understand the world around us is of course, but we should also value cool-headed reports from the New York Times.
There is no argument. Here Additional resources better knowledge.
To do business.
But I think Tom is to turn off the music when he made his 2.0 interest in business as soon as the idea of many information sources and blogs "curated", and discussions. His argument: the unstated facilitators and community organizers, exchanging ideas and easily digestible.
But the control comes with a price, as well as the presence of the server object can alter the results of an experiment. The appearance of the editor or curator shape corrals and dilutes the follow conversations.
This is good news in the world 2.0 we don't need em ', we can immediately to supervisor because the existing technology of the Web, useful tools for connecting to and causes the stream of knowledge that we find useful. These tools include content tagging (and/folksonomy or structured taxonomy), Social bookmarks. Visualization collaboration and wikis that share online. RSS feeds — all help us to understand the data as it flows by.
Controlled by the meeting on track but their bias rather than benefit Exchange 2.0 the simple truth is that businesses could create network 2.0 by Fiat Executive. They can only make sure that the tools and infrastructure in place for people who want to network, form.
Agree with me that "Web 1.5 ″ is worst of worlds, 1.0 and 2.0 or Tom Davenport, right that expert and author of the content is more effective when we share. Instead of separately?
(Team leader, CC image by lumaxart 2.0).
没有评论:
发表评论